While everyone is discussing the Republican Gubernatorial wins in NJ and Virginia, the bigger story is the massive rejection of legislative challengers, especially the refusal to support third parties.
The following analysis is based on preliminary information and will be expanded in a future article on this web site.
Chris Daggett, an unaffiliated independent for Governor, was polling as high as 20% about ten days before the election, but received 6% in the vote. Mr. Dagget had the best of the third party political advisors, the endorsement of the largest newspaper in the state, ran an intensive campaign, and spent the most money of third party NJ gubernatorial candidates. His 6% was the highest percentage of NJ Third Party voters received in any of the State Races. Only 6% – an obvious rejection of third parties.
The Assembly races tell a more interesting story.
Based on a quick scan of all the races, it looks like every incumbent was re-elected. In another words, voters rejected every challenger, even though it is the legislature that has given them the laws that they have been complaining about.
I followed two third party Assembly races closely during this campaign. My own in District 14 and that of Jim Poesl in adjacent District 19.
In my case, I got about 1% of the vote and Jim also got 1% of the vote. There was also another Independent candidate in the 19th on the same ticket with Jim, and he got 3%,the most of any Independent Assembly candidate in the State.
Just as a control – the Libertarians that ran in the 15th District, another adjacent to mine, also received 1% of the vote.
One final comment on this day after the election. Both Jim in the 19th, and Baldassari in the 14th, campaigned heavily. We both made a serious attempt to win.
Due to this massive rejection of third parties and the voters statewide refusal to throw out any of the incumbents, it would not have mattered how much any of the challengers spent. None of us would have won.
But when it comes to my campaign, there was also a personal rejection of my candidacy, beyond the general voter rejection. I was relatively unknown in the northern part of my district. But I was very well known in the southern part of my district. In fact, I had the best name recognition of all the other challengers. I spent hundreds of hours, meeting thousands of voters for the past 7 months; I had good press in the southern part of the district, and ran businesses there since the 1960’s. But I only received 129 more votes in the known portion.
Here are the Results:
Total Votes Baldassari
Mercer County (Best known) - 51289 425
Middlesex County (Unknown) - 64848 296
Considering the amount of Baldassari campaigning involved in Mercer, it seems like campaigning was useless. One other interesting number. An Assembly candidate in this district in the last election did almost no campaigning and was relatively unknown and he received about 50% more votes than me.
I will have more to write about this in the coming weeks. We need to examine why the voters in NJ have no interest in bringing us fresh blood while complaining about corruption, high taxes, overpriced schools, and a health care system that they do not like.
- Gene Baldassari


Sir ,
I for one am not dismayed by these results for you were able to change the minds of 721 people who had never heard of the party before last year. The challenges ahead of us although great must be tackled and will and can be overcome. Myself I am currently considering a city council run to be a dissenting opinion for the overspending in our city here in California. Please do not give up the fight because all great moments in history started with a small group of dedicated individuals wanting to accomplish a common goal.
Thank you for your time and service sir
Brian Gingrich
Brian,
I appreciate your comment.
None of the third party runs in NJ garnered a reasonable amount of votes. The problem is the mindset of the public that it is unpatriotic or sinful to vote for anyone other than a member of a monopoly party. This is the mindset that must be broken before we can kill the political beast that has destroyed our country.
Good luck with your campaign.
Gene
Gene,
The top of the ticket determines the turnout. With the Republicans and Democrats combined commanding the support of only 40% of the voters, the only way they can maintain a monopoly on political office is to turn off the 60% of the electorate that is independent.
That is what the negative campaigning is designed to do. Our (the independents) supporters stayed home. This election had the lowest turnout in history. Christie won with fewer actual votes than the winning candidate in 1965, when there were 2 million fewer voters.
What we need is a full slate of candidates.
Josh Leinsdorf
Joshua,
Thanks for the astute observation. Instead of the results indicating a rejection of third parties, it was the lack of voting by the majority of voters that prevented third party wins.
That means our majority is still hidden and is still available. Consequently, the job is not to convince the 40% who will always vote for a monopoly party. The job is to appeal to the other 60%.
I like it.
Gene